Fixed the problems caused by serialization

This commit is contained in:
Lennart Hensler committed 2014-08-07 09:48:51 +02:00
1 parent 5caeb9e334
commit 9bdfbff531
11 files changed
+35 -25

No files matched your search

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
package com.sap.sailing.datamining;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import com.sap.sailing.datamining.shared.DimensionIdentifier;
@@ -14,7 +15,7 @@ public class QueryDefinitionConverter {
DeprecatedEnumsToFunctionDTOConverter.getFunctionDTOFor(queryDefinitionDeprecated.getStatisticType()),
queryDefinitionDeprecated.getAggregatorType());
for (Entry<DimensionIdentifier, Iterable<?>> filterSelectionEntry : queryDefinitionDeprecated.getSelection()
for (Entry<DimensionIdentifier, Iterable<? extends Serializable>> filterSelectionEntry : queryDefinitionDeprecated.getSelection()
.entrySet()) {
queryDefinition.setFilterSelectionFor(
DeprecatedEnumsToFunctionDTOConverter.getFunctionDTOFor(filterSelectionEntry.getKey()),
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
package com.sap.sailing.datamining.factories;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ public final class SailingDataRetrieverFactory {
* @return The first processor of the retrieval chain.
*/
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <DataSourceType, ElementType> Processor<DataSourceType> createRetrievalProcessorChain(SailingDataRetrievalLevels dataRetrievalLevel, Processor<ElementType> groupingProcessor, Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<?>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
public static <DataSourceType, ElementType> Processor<DataSourceType> createRetrievalProcessorChain(SailingDataRetrievalLevels dataRetrievalLevel, Processor<ElementType> groupingProcessor, Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<? extends Serializable>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
Processor<?> resultReceiver = groupingProcessor;
for (int i = dataRetrievalLevel.ordinal(); i >= 0; i--) {
resultReceiver = createDataRetrieverFor(SailingDataRetrievalLevels.values()[i], resultReceiver, filterSelection, functionProvider);
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ public final class SailingDataRetrieverFactory {
/* The way this method is used should guarantee, that the result receiver matches the new processor
*/
private static Processor<?> createDataRetrieverFor(SailingDataRetrievalLevels dataRetrievalLevel,
Processor<?> resultReceiver, Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<?>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
Processor<?> resultReceiver, Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<? extends Serializable>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
ThreadPoolExecutor executor = DataMiningActivator.getExecutor();
switch (dataRetrievalLevel) {
@@ -83,9 +84,9 @@ public final class SailingDataRetrieverFactory {
}
private static <BaseDataType> FilterCriteria<BaseDataType> getFilterCriteriaForBaseDataType(Class<BaseDataType> baseDataType,
Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<?>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
Map<FunctionDTO, Iterable<? extends Serializable>> filterSelection, FunctionProvider functionProvider) {
CompoundFilterCriteria<BaseDataType> criteria = null;
for (Entry<FunctionDTO, Iterable<?>> filterSelectionEntry : filterSelection.entrySet()) {
for (Entry<FunctionDTO, Iterable<? extends Serializable>> filterSelectionEntry : filterSelection.entrySet()) {
Function<?> function = functionProvider.getFunctionForDTO(filterSelectionEntry.getKey());
if (baseDataType.equals(function.getDeclaringType())) {
if (criteria == null) {